Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

Search representations

Results for Mr Community Campaigner David Barton search

New search New search

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

1. Introduction

Representation ID: 740

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Traditional Architecture Design Codes must be a key priority
Ban on Demolition of Old Builds constricted prior to 1950.
Reconstruction of Old Builds must be supported.
See my PDF Umbrella Representation for additional Placemaking, Conservation and Greenery Proposals.

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

2. What Are Heritage Assets?

Representation ID: 741

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Traditional Architecture Design Codes must be a key priority
Ban on Demolition of Old Builds constricted prior to 1950.
Reconstruction of Old Builds must be supported.
See my PDF Umbrella Representation for additional Placemaking, Conservation and Greenery Proposals.
MUCH GREATER SUPPORT required for NON-Designated Heritage Assets that are often demolished after being sold cheaply. If that does happen then the LA must engage a Section 4 style directive that is unlimited in time with incentives for full restoration and reutilisation.

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

3. What is a Local List?

Representation ID: 742

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

This should include residential an commercial with incentives for private property owners to maintain their buildings without pursing contemporary renovation spoiling historic features.

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

4. The Implications of Local Listing

Representation ID: 743

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

A new process with full protections against buildings left to seemingly avoidable decline must be enacted asap. Present Policy regarding Non-Designated Heritage Assets is too relaxed.

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

5. Planning Policy Context

Representation ID: 744

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Require far better coordinated approach to protect NDHAs against avoidable decline and demolition

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

6. Guidance on Works to Locally Listed Buildings

Representation ID: 745

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Th fullest support must be provided to those property owners willing to mutually engage and seek restorative reuse of historic buildings and sites. Where budget constraints or dimensional anomalies apply due support must still be provided.

Support

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

7. Nominating Buildings for the Local List

Representation ID: 746

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Good start to protecting endangered buildings with further support required such as security packages paid back through eventual restoration and reuse of building(s).

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

8. Local List Entry

Representation ID: 747

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

All fine but fullest support requires effective Placemaking to identify individual buildings with optimal capacity and usage for any one given usage.

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

9. Local List Selection Criteria

Representation ID: 748

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Streamlined simplified listing process required that doesn't alert builder property owners into accelerating demolition plans with alternative proposals for these historic areas that don't use demolition.

Comment

Final Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

10. Procedure for Adding to or Removing Entries from The Local List

Representation ID: 749

Received: 11/05/2026

Respondent: Mr Community Campaigner David Barton

Representation Summary:

Heritage MUSN'T be removed from any list only added to.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.