Local plan scoping consultation

Comment

Representation ID: 4488

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Chaplin

Printed copies should be available at more locations

Comment

Representation ID: 4491

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Chaplin

Final bullet point of high priority

Comment

Representation ID: 4531

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Chaplin

Does Para 3.6 infer that a higher number will be required to meet the needs of the areas within the combined authority.
Para 3.7 : the revised NPPF is specific as to reasons for refusal and the issue of sustainability a key issue also

Comment

Representation ID: 4649

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Chaplin

To sparse a description when considering connections to Manchester as a northern regional hub and rail connections planned in the future.

Comment

Representation ID: 4651

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Chaplin

As the one of the measurable outcomes of the local plan will its impact on the growth of the economy then this section should be more specific outlining the industrial sectors as described in CE's own publications and website for the business community. These also detail the opportunities for growth of each of these sectors to which the outcomes of the local plan can contribute.

Comment

Representation ID: 4755

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Chaplin

This 'scoping' consultation will already provide evidence as to whether or not your key principles and methodology for community engagement is a yielding both the quantitative and qualitative outcomes you envisaged and or required at this first stage. When the current local plan was consulted upon and formulated one of the most committed and continuous engagement was through community groups established in a number of towns/districts. It was through these local community groups that residents in the town were kept up to date and engaged in the process.