Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Pinnacle Planning search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Housing

Representation ID: 6792

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

The new Local Plan should set a clear minimum housing requirement, using the
standard method as the starting point and testing whether an uplift is needed to reflect
economic growth, infrastructure investment and unmet needs.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Settlement hierarchy

Representation ID: 6793

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

A comprehensive review of the hierarchy is required. Settlements
such as Alderley Edge with its level of services, employment role and sustainability
credentials supporting consideration of its elevation from Local Service Centre to Key
Service Centre.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial distribution

Representation ID: 6794

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

Growth should be distributed through a plan
led, evidence-based approach which addresses current under-delivery, recognises the
needs of Local Service Centres and secures a fairer balance between northern and
southern Cheshire East

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 6795

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan must be underpinned by robust SHLAA,
SHENA and viability evidence which transparently tests site suitability, deliverability,
constraints and the ability to provide affordable housing and infrastructure.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 6796

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

A Green Belt and grey belt assessment is needed to identify sustainable
release opportunities, particularly where land does not strongly contribute to Green Belt
purposes and can help meet housing needs.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Design

Representation ID: 6797

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

Design policy should await national guidance and avoid overly prescriptive or
borough-wide requirements that could undermine flexibility, viability or site-specific
placemaking.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Housing mix

Representation ID: 6798

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

Housing mix policy should remain flexible and responsive to updated
evidence, market conditions and the differing needs of individual settlements.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Housing standards

Representation ID: 6799

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

Local standards should not duplicate or exceed national
requirements unless justified by robust evidence and viability testing.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Climate Change Adaptation

Representation ID: 6800

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

National Building Regulations, the Future Homes Standard
and NPPF policies already provide the appropriate framework for low-carbon homes, and
local policy should avoid unnecessary duplication or higher untested requirements.

Attachments:

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Engagement Approach

Representation ID: 6801

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

Early, proactive and direct engagement with landowners, promoters and
developers is essential to ensure site allocations are realistic, deliverable and supported
by credible trajectories.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.