Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Manchester Airports Group search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

3 Context for the new local plan

Representation ID: 6818

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

The respondent argues that the Local Plan should align with national aviation policy and recognise Manchester Airport’s strategic economic role in supporting regional and national growth. They highlight Government support for making best use of existing airport capacity, subject to addressing environmental impacts, and suggest the Local Plan should reflect wider economic initiatives such as the Northern Growth Strategy. The response welcomes the inclusion of Manchester Airport’s Sustainable Development Plan (SDP) within the evidence base and requests that the emerging Local Plan takes account of the updated SDP, ensuring future airport growth, connectivity, economic benefits and environmental considerations are appropriately reflected in planning decisions.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Economic growth

Representation ID: 6820

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

The respondent argues that Manchester Airport should be given greater recognition in the Local Plan as a major driver of economic growth, employment, connectivity and investment. They state that the airport makes a significant contribution to Cheshire East’s economy, supports thousands of jobs and plays an important role in freight, logistics and business connectivity. The response calls for planning policies to recognise and support the airport’s future development and infrastructure needs, safeguard land for airport-related uses and ensure appropriate weight is given to its economic benefits. It also recommends aligning the Local Plan with national aviation policy and the Airport’s updated Sustainable Development Plan.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Connectivity

Representation ID: 6821

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports recognising Manchester Airport’s role in enhancing regional connectivity and driving economic growth. They argue that improving transport links and accessibility between Cheshire East and the airport should be a priority within the Local Plan, helping residents and businesses benefit from international connectivity and associated economic opportunities. The response highlights the airport’s commitment to sustainable travel and transport improvements through its Surface Access Plan and wider growth strategy. It recommends that the Local Plan supports infrastructure and connectivity enhancements that strengthen links to Manchester Airport and contribute to sustainable communities, economic development and improved access to employment and services.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Economic contribution

Representation ID: 6823

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

Please refer to our comments made under the ‘economic growth’ section above. The new Local Plan should recognise the Airport’s role in the local and regional economy and its economic contribution to the borough, including as a major employer. Reference to the
Airport in this regard is absent in paragraphs 4.6 - 4.10 of the Scoping Report, and this should be corrected at the next stage of plan - making. We can assist in providing the latest economic estimates of the Airport’s economic footprint, GVA contribution and employment
figures to support the Local Plan evidence base.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Creating a vision and objectives

Representation ID: 6824

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

We recommend that the Vision for Cheshire East includes recognition of Manchester Airport as the primary international gateway for the Nort h and the opportunity to leverage the benefits of its location and its operations for the borough .
We also recommend that having accessible, frequent and reliable sustainable transport choices should form a fundamental aspect of the Vision for the borough.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Planning for growth

Representation ID: 6825

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports the Local Plan’s focus on sustainable economic growth but argues that Manchester Airport’s role should be more prominently reflected in planning policy. They emphasise the airport’s contribution to economic activity, international connectivity and employment, and advocate a positive approach to airport-related development and infrastructure. The response highlights national planning policy support for transport infrastructure, including airports, and stresses the importance of safeguarding connectivity and enabling future airport expansion where appropriate. It also supports a vision-led approach to transport planning, arguing that sustainable transport improvements and strong links to Manchester Airport are essential for long-term economic growth and investment.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 6826

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

We welcome a Green Belt Assessment being undertaken (paragraph 5.18 of the Scoping Report) and look forward to reviewing its conclusions, including the identification of grey
belt land, in due course.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Development in settlements

Representation ID: 6827

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

It is important that the Local Plan draws appropriate ‘settlement’ boundaries given the new NPPF ’s policy S4 and S5 relating to how development inside/outside settlement boundaries should be treated.
The extent of the Airport within Cheshire East does not ordinarily form part of a ‘settlement’ but is instead a separate, previously developed and actively used site that should be subject to a standalone policy guiding its use and future development (as reflected in more detailed
comments further below). It should not be included within a ‘settlement’ boundary subject to NPPF ’s policy S4 but equally should not be considered outside a ‘settlement’ and subject to NPPF policy S5 .

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Development in the countryside

Representation ID: 6828

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

It is important that the Local Plan draws appropriate ‘settlement’ boundaries given the new NPPF ’s policy S4 and S5 relating to how development inside/outside settlement boundaries should be treated.
The extent of the Airport within Cheshire East does not ordinarily form part of a ‘settlement’ but is instead a separate, previously developed and actively used site that should be subject to a standalone policy guiding its use and future development (as reflected in more detailed
comments further below). It should not be included within a ‘settlement’ boundary subject to NPPF ’s policy S4 but equally should not be considered outside a ‘settlement’ and subject to NPPF policy S5 .

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Housing

Representation ID: 6829

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Manchester Airports Group

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports increasing housing supply but emphasises that development near Manchester Airport must be carefully planned to avoid impacts on airport operations, transport networks and aviation safety. They argue that housing allocations should account for aircraft noise, airport safeguarding requirements and national aviation policy, with no residential development proposed in areas experiencing significant adverse noise effects. The response highlights the importance of considering Manchester Airport’s Noise Action Plan and safeguarding regulations during site selection and design. It also advocates protecting the airport’s long-term operation and growth by ensuring new development does not create noise, safety, bird strike, radar or other aviation-related constraints.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.