Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Dr Elizabeth Rhodes search
New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 5434
Received: 31/08/2026
Respondent: Dr Elizabeth Rhodes
The respondent strongly supports protecting Green Belt land around Ashley, Mobberley, and Knutsford, arguing that these are distinct communities with separate identities that are defined by the open countryside between them. They emphasise the environmental importance of the surrounding rural landscape, including its role in supporting wildlife corridors, agriculture, the local economy, and national food security. While acknowledging the need for additional housing in Cheshire East, they believe development should be focused on brownfield and previously developed land, particularly within larger settlements such as Crewe where regeneration could bring wider benefits. They oppose the loss or reclassification of Green Belt land.
I appreciate the need for more housing in Cheshire East. However, I should like to see the prioritising of building on waste land in substantial settlements such as Crewe (where regeneration might be beneficial), rather than the recategorizing or destruction of greenbelt which is serving a vital purpose.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Housing
Representation ID: 5435
Received: 31/08/2026
Respondent: Dr Elizabeth Rhodes
The respondent strongly supports protecting Green Belt land around Ashley, Mobberley, and Knutsford, arguing that these are distinct communities with separate identities that are defined by the open countryside between them. They emphasise the environmental importance of the surrounding rural landscape, including its role in supporting wildlife corridors, agriculture, the local economy, and national food security. While acknowledging the need for additional housing in Cheshire East, they believe development should be focused on brownfield and previously developed land, particularly within larger settlements such as Crewe where regeneration could bring wider benefits. They oppose the loss or reclassification of Green Belt land.