Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Mr Alex Latham search
New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Reducing Carbon Emissions
Representation ID: 4522
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: Mr Alex Latham
Building in greenbelt will only add to carbon emissions. Residents in green belt areas will
Inevitably have to drive to find work. It would be more sensible to build in urban areas where public transport is better and jobs are close by
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Health and wellbeing
Representation ID: 4523
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: Mr Alex Latham
There needs to be significant investment in the local health authority. The health service in east Cheshire is failing. Adding more to the population without significant further investment in health would only cause further problems
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 4524
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: Mr Alex Latham
The site identified in Mobberley is completely inappropriate for a large development. The roads are already over run and in poor condition. The school couldn’t accommodate a significant rise in families, the health facilities are not large enough. Furthermore public transport links are poor and there are very few local jobs to support workers
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Changes to Green Belt policy
Representation ID: 4525
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: Mr Alex Latham
I am strongly against reclassifying green belt to grey belt distinction. This is very subjective and open to interpretation which will inevitably mean developments are approved in rural areas where there isn’t the infrastructure to support them.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Increase in housing requirements
Representation ID: 4526
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: Mr Alex Latham
I am strongly against building on green belt just to meant the u realistic requirements being placed on the area. There are many more suitable brownfield sites, as well as many unoccupied dwellings. It would be much more environmentally friendly to renovate these than destroy countryside