Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for The Green Party search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 5341

Received: 26/08/2026

Respondent: The Green Party

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports a Local Plan approach that prioritises brownfield and previously developed land before considering any Green Belt release. They state that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed where development needs cannot be met elsewhere or where development around railway stations is proposed in accordance with national policy. Concerns are raised about climate change, arguing that large-scale development in rural locations with limited public transport would increase car dependency and transport emissions. The response also highlights the need for more social and affordable housing, emphasising that new homes should be energy efficient and supported by appropriate infrastructure, services and facilities.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Climate Change

Representation ID: 5342

Received: 26/08/2026

Respondent: The Green Party

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports a Local Plan approach that prioritises brownfield and previously developed land before considering any Green Belt release. They state that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed where development needs cannot be met elsewhere or where development around railway stations is proposed in accordance with national policy. Concerns are raised about climate change, arguing that large-scale development in rural locations with limited public transport would increase car dependency and transport emissions. The response also highlights the need for more social and affordable housing, emphasising that new homes should be energy efficient and supported by appropriate infrastructure, services and facilities.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Affordable housing

Representation ID: 5343

Received: 26/08/2026

Respondent: The Green Party

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports a Local Plan approach that prioritises brownfield and previously developed land before considering any Green Belt release. They state that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed where development needs cannot be met elsewhere or where development around railway stations is proposed in accordance with national policy. Concerns are raised about climate change, arguing that large-scale development in rural locations with limited public transport would increase car dependency and transport emissions. The response also highlights the need for more social and affordable housing, emphasising that new homes should be energy efficient and supported by appropriate infrastructure, services and facilities.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.