Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for The Green Party search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: The Green Party
Representation Summary:
The respondent supports a Local Plan approach that prioritises brownfield and previously developed land before considering any Green Belt release. They state that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed where development needs cannot be met elsewhere or where development around railway stations is proposed in accordance with national policy. Concerns are raised about climate change, arguing that large-scale development in rural locations with limited public transport would increase car dependency and transport emissions. The response also highlights the need for more social and affordable housing, emphasising that new homes should be energy efficient and supported by appropriate infrastructure, services and facilities.
Full text:
We write in response to the Cheshire East Council local Plan consultation on the key points and priorities listed below:
The Local Plan sets out to allocate sites for future development.
It should do that by keeping to government guidelines and adopted changes to green belt policy.
• Show any proposed development needs
• Illustrate that it has prioritised the use of Brownfield (previously developed ) sites and regeneration of urban areas
• Through the Local Plan process “Green belt boundaries can only be changed where development around railway stations is proposed or where exceptional circumstances exist and development needs cannot be met elsewhere”. If such circumstances are identified priority should be given to previously developed (Brownfield) land
• Climate Change – The plan will also need to reduce transport emissions. Building large developments of houses in rural communities which lack public transport links would require car dependency for hundreds of people every day. This would not be consistent with government and Cheshire East Council climate commitments
• Social Housing – Whilst recognising the need for building houses, we also recognise the severe shortfall in social housing and affordable homes. In our climate and nature crisis this can only be addressed by the right energy efficient homes in the right place, with infrastructure and facilities in place.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: The Green Party
Representation Summary:
The respondent supports a Local Plan approach that prioritises brownfield and previously developed land before considering any Green Belt release. They state that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed where development needs cannot be met elsewhere or where development around railway stations is proposed in accordance with national policy. Concerns are raised about climate change, arguing that large-scale development in rural locations with limited public transport would increase car dependency and transport emissions. The response also highlights the need for more social and affordable housing, emphasising that new homes should be energy efficient and supported by appropriate infrastructure, services and facilities.
Full text:
We write in response to the Cheshire East Council local Plan consultation on the key points and priorities listed below:
The Local Plan sets out to allocate sites for future development.
It should do that by keeping to government guidelines and adopted changes to green belt policy.
• Show any proposed development needs
• Illustrate that it has prioritised the use of Brownfield (previously developed ) sites and regeneration of urban areas
• Through the Local Plan process “Green belt boundaries can only be changed where development around railway stations is proposed or where exceptional circumstances exist and development needs cannot be met elsewhere”. If such circumstances are identified priority should be given to previously developed (Brownfield) land
• Climate Change – The plan will also need to reduce transport emissions. Building large developments of houses in rural communities which lack public transport links would require car dependency for hundreds of people every day. This would not be consistent with government and Cheshire East Council climate commitments
• Social Housing – Whilst recognising the need for building houses, we also recognise the severe shortfall in social housing and affordable homes. In our climate and nature crisis this can only be addressed by the right energy efficient homes in the right place, with infrastructure and facilities in place.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: The Green Party
Representation Summary:
The respondent supports a Local Plan approach that prioritises brownfield and previously developed land before considering any Green Belt release. They state that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed where development needs cannot be met elsewhere or where development around railway stations is proposed in accordance with national policy. Concerns are raised about climate change, arguing that large-scale development in rural locations with limited public transport would increase car dependency and transport emissions. The response also highlights the need for more social and affordable housing, emphasising that new homes should be energy efficient and supported by appropriate infrastructure, services and facilities.
Full text:
We write in response to the Cheshire East Council local Plan consultation on the key points and priorities listed below:
The Local Plan sets out to allocate sites for future development.
It should do that by keeping to government guidelines and adopted changes to green belt policy.
• Show any proposed development needs
• Illustrate that it has prioritised the use of Brownfield (previously developed ) sites and regeneration of urban areas
• Through the Local Plan process “Green belt boundaries can only be changed where development around railway stations is proposed or where exceptional circumstances exist and development needs cannot be met elsewhere”. If such circumstances are identified priority should be given to previously developed (Brownfield) land
• Climate Change – The plan will also need to reduce transport emissions. Building large developments of houses in rural communities which lack public transport links would require car dependency for hundreds of people every day. This would not be consistent with government and Cheshire East Council climate commitments
• Social Housing – Whilst recognising the need for building houses, we also recognise the severe shortfall in social housing and affordable homes. In our climate and nature crisis this can only be addressed by the right energy efficient homes in the right place, with infrastructure and facilities in place.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.