Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for David Gadsby search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 5390

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: David Gadsby

Representation Summary:

I want to object to the 291-hectare land submitted around Ashley. Our village has no services, no buses and a station with just one train an hour, making it impossible to call Ashley “well connected”. Every road into the village crosses a narrow bridge, so any large development would create serious congestion and safety problems. The land is all Green Belt and productive farmland, and the area includes sensitive landscapes, wildlife habitats and listed heritage buildings that would be permanently damaged. This site is completely unsuitable and should be removed from consideration.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 5391

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: David Gadsby

Representation Summary:

I want to object to the 291-hectare land submitted around Ashley. Our village has no services, no buses and a station with just one train an hour, making it impossible to call Ashley “well connected”. Every road into the village crosses a narrow bridge, so any large development would create serious congestion and safety problems. The land is all Green Belt and productive farmland, and the area includes sensitive landscapes, wildlife habitats and listed heritage buildings that would be permanently damaged. This site is completely unsuitable and should be removed from consideration.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Natural environment

Representation ID: 5392

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: David Gadsby

Representation Summary:

I want to object to the 291-hectare land submitted around Ashley. Our village has no services, no buses and a station with just one train an hour, making it impossible to call Ashley “well connected”. Every road into the village crosses a narrow bridge, so any large development would create serious congestion and safety problems. The land is all Green Belt and productive farmland, and the area includes sensitive landscapes, wildlife habitats and listed heritage buildings that would be permanently damaged. This site is completely unsuitable and should be removed from consideration.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Heritage

Representation ID: 5393

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: David Gadsby

Representation Summary:

I want to object to the 291-hectare land submitted around Ashley. Our village has no services, no buses and a station with just one train an hour, making it impossible to call Ashley “well connected”. Every road into the village crosses a narrow bridge, so any large development would create serious congestion and safety problems. The land is all Green Belt and productive farmland, and the area includes sensitive landscapes, wildlife habitats and listed heritage buildings that would be permanently damaged. This site is completely unsuitable and should be removed from consideration.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Transport and infrastructure

Representation ID: 5395

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: David Gadsby

Representation Summary:

I want to object to the 291-hectare land submitted around Ashley. Our village has no services, no buses and a station with just one train an hour, making it impossible to call Ashley “well connected”. Every road into the village crosses a narrow bridge, so any large development would create serious congestion and safety problems. The land is all Green Belt and productive farmland, and the area includes sensitive landscapes, wildlife habitats and listed heritage buildings that would be permanently damaged. This site is completely unsuitable and should be removed from consideration.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.