Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Richard Hankinson search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 5982

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports the preparation of a new Cheshire East Local Plan and argues that it should positively plan for increased housing requirements arising from national policy. They contend that brownfield land alone is unlikely to meet future needs and support consideration of greenfield, Grey Belt and Green Belt sites where justified. The submission promotes land off Hollin Lane, Styal, for residential development, describing it as a sustainable, available and deliverable site with good access to rail services, Manchester Airport, Wilmslow and employment opportunities. The respondent requests that the site be assessed for allocation and supports a balanced spatial distribution of housing growth across the borough.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

2 New local plan

Representation ID: 5983

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The Council’s intention to prepare a new Local Plan under the government’s new local-plan making system is
welcomed, particularly in the context of the significantly altered national planning policy position and the
government’s ambition to deliver new homes to address the housing crisis, which includes a commitment to
deliver 1.5 million new homes nationally during this Parliament.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Increase in housing requirements

Representation ID: 5986

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The respondent argues that Cheshire East’s housing need of 2,531 dwellings per annum should be treated as the minimum requirement for the new Local Plan, reflecting a significant increase over the current target. They contend that brownfield land alone is unlikely to meet future housing demand and that the Plan should proactively consider greenfield, Grey Belt, and Green Belt releases where justified. Robust, evidence-led assessments should guide site selection and ensure sufficient deliverable and developable land is available throughout the plan period. The respondent also supports further Call for Sites exercises and a balanced spatial distribution of sustainable growth across the borough.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Changes to Green Belt policy

Representation ID: 5987

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The Council rightly recognises Green Belt land should be reviewed to meet the needs of the Borough. In
advance of this, the Council should also consider greenfield and grey belt land (NPPF 2026 Policy GB4).

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial development strategy

Representation ID: 5989

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

It is welcomed that the Council will continue to prepare their Local Plan in advance of the preparation of a
‘Spatial Development Strategy’ (SDS) for Cheshire and Warrington by the Combined Authority.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

National decision making policies

Representation ID: 5990

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The NPPF 2026 introduces national decision-making policies. These policies are material considerations that
must be taken into account in decision-making from the date of publication of the NPPF 2026, 17 August 2026.
The NPPF 2026 makes clear that development plan policies, or parts of those policies, that are materially
inconsistent with national decision-making policies should be given very limited weight. It is therefore
important that the policies within the emerging Cheshire East Local Plan are consistent with the NPPF 2026,
without replicating national policy or applying standards over and above national requirements, such as the
Future Homes Standard. The new Cheshire East Local Plan should focus on locally specific matters and avoid
unnecessary duplication of national policy. The recognition of this in the Consultation Document is welcomed.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Local plan period

Representation ID: 5992

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The proposed Local Plan period of 15 years is welcomed. Whilst the NPPF 2026 has reduced the minimum
Local Plan period from 15 to 10 years, the scale of the housing and other development needs across Cheshire
East necessitates a comprehensive period to deliver the scale of development likely to be required across the
Borough to meet its needs.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 5994

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

As noted above, whilst it is welcomed that the Council recognise Green Belt land is likely to be required to
meet the needs of the Borough, there is a requirement through the NPPF 2026 to first also consider greenfield
and grey belt land (Policy GB4).

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Settlement hierarchy

Representation ID: 5995

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

The respondent argues that Styal should be recognised as a more sustainable location for growth than its current classification as an “Other Settlement and Rural Area” suggests. While development is currently expected to remain proportionate to the village’s size and character, Styal benefits from strong sustainability credentials, including a railway station on the Manchester-Crewe line, access to Manchester Airport, and close proximity to Wilmslow. The village is well connected to employment opportunities, services, schools, and community facilities, and has strong links to the Greater Manchester economy. The respondent suggests the revised settlement hierarchy should reflect these advantages and accommodate increased sustainable development.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial distribution

Representation ID: 5997

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Richard Hankinson

Representation Summary:

It is agreed that a range of options for the distribution of development will be required in order to identify the
most appropriate and sustainable strategy to accommodate the scale of development required across the
Borough. The Consultation Document identifies this is likely to be informed by housing demand and
availability, infrastructure capacity and constraints, environmental considerations and the market
attractiveness of locations. The ultimate spatial strategy is likely to include a combination of options including
development within existing settlements, edge of settlement growth, large-scale urban extensions and/or new
settlements. This approach is welcomed. The spatial distribution of development across the Borough should be
balanced and should avoid the over-concentration of growth or economic investment in one part of the
Borough.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.