Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Lesley Haresnape search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Respondent: Lesley Haresnape
Representation Summary:
I am concerned about the scale of potential development around Poynton and Adlington and believe it could result in significant loss of Green Belt, urban sprawl and harm to the character of existing communities. Development would also result in the loss of productive farmland and important wildlife habitats. I am concerned that existing roads, railways, healthcare and community infrastructure are already under pressure and that additional schools and water infrastructure would be required. Flood risk could also increase as a result of development and climate change. I support providing affordable housing but believe brownfield sites and existing empty homes should be prioritised first.
Full text:
I have seen the land submissions put forward for the next local plan & would like to make the following comments, relating mostly to Poynton & Adlington but our area in general:-
1)Virtually all the greenbelt around Poynton has been identified in the plan, if this is all developed our town will become an extension of Manchester, resulting in urban sprawl that the greenbelt was designed to prevent. This would be worsened by the development of sites in Adlington, extending the urban sprawl as far as Macclesfield
2)All the proposed sites are on productive farmland resulting in further loss of domestic food production
3)Development of all the areas highlighted would create infeasible pressure on the existing infrastructure. Our roads & railways are already at capacity, as are GP surgeries ,hospitals & community services. Any further developments in our area would need to address these issues, together with the provision of schools. I understand that it is not feasible to extend the rail services due to the throughput of the London trains & length of existing rail platforms.
4)The areas highlighted for development include important wildlife habitats which if developed will be lost forever
5)The areas of Poynton & Adlington have been subject to flooding in the past, the risk of which is likely to increase with climate change. Increasing areas of development & concrete will increase this risk for both communities. Water supply to an increased population would also need to be addressed.
6)I understand the need for more affordable houses & government targets but not at the cost of valuable greenbelt, brownfield sites & existing empty housing should be considered first.
7)If the areas highlighted were to be developed, the character & identity of our villages & town would be lost.
Cheshire East covers some areas of rural natural beauty, over development would decimate our the countryside & the nature that we have forever
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.