Local plan scoping consultation

Basic overall comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing allocation on land between Ryecroft Lane and
Pavement Lane. This development would result in the loss of valuable open
countryside, eroding the rural character and setting of the area. The site is poorly served
by existing infrastructure, with local roads already experiencing congestion and limited
capacity to accommodate additional traffic. Increased housing would place further
pressure on GP services, schools, and other community facilities. The proposal could
also harm local biodiversity, wildlife habitats, and landscape quality. More sustainable
brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing greenfield land for residential
development in this location.
Infrastructure based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane due to its significant impact on local infrastructure and the
environment. The surrounding road network is already under pressure and lacks the
capacity to accommodate increased traffic, leading to congestion, road safety
concerns, noise, and air pollution. Local schools, GP surgeries, and other essential
services are stretched and would face additional demand. The development would also
result in the loss of greenfield land, harm biodiversity, fragment wildlife habitats, reduce
natural drainage, increase surface water runoff and flood risk, and weaken the rural
character of the area.
Traffic based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The local road network is narrow, poorly suited to increased traffic,
and already experiences congestion at peak times. Additional vehicles would worsen
road safety concerns for residents, cyclists, and pedestrians. Footpath provision in the
area is limited and inadequate, making safe access to local services difficult and
increasing reliance on cars. The development would generate significant additional
traffic on roads that lack the capacity to accommodate further growth. It would also
increase noise and air pollution while placing further pressure on already stretched
local infrastructure and services.
Residents View focused comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purposes of the Green Belt, replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would result in the loss of the area's distinctive rural character,
transforming an open, agricultural landscape into a suburban housing estate. The visual
impact would be considerable, with new homes, roads, lighting and infrastructure
creating an intrusive urban presence. Residents would lose valued countryside views
and a sense of openness, while the development would erode the rural setting,
landscape quality and local identity that make this area unique.
Village Character and Identity comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purpose of the Green Belt by replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would erode the area's distinctive rural character and village charm,
qualities that are highly valued by residents and contribute to the village's unique
identity. The peaceful countryside setting, attractive views, and sense of separation
from larger settlements would be lost. Housing, roads and lighting would create an
intrusive urban presence, diminishing the village's character, setting, sense of place and
long-established rural appeal.
Environmental Concerns comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The scheme would result in the unnecessary loss of greenfield
land, damaging the rural character and landscape of the area. Development would
increase surface water runoff, flood risk, noise, air pollution, and carbon emissions
from additional vehicle traffic. It could lead to the loss and fragmentation of wildlife
habitats, negatively affecting birds, mammals, pollinators, and protected species.
Mature trees, hedgerows, and biodiversity corridors may also be harmed. Furthermore,
local roads, schools, healthcare services, and other infrastructure are already under
pressure and may struggle to accommodate further growth.

Basic overall comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing allocation on land between Ryecroft Lane and
Pavement Lane. This development would result in the loss of valuable open
countryside, eroding the rural character and setting of the area. The site is poorly served
by existing infrastructure, with local roads already experiencing congestion and limited
capacity to accommodate additional traffic. Increased housing would place further
pressure on GP services, schools, and other community facilities. The proposal could
also harm local biodiversity, wildlife habitats, and landscape quality. More sustainable
brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing greenfield land for residential
development in this location.
Infrastructure based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane due to its significant impact on local infrastructure and the
environment. The surrounding road network is already under pressure and lacks the
capacity to accommodate increased traffic, leading to congestion, road safety
concerns, noise, and air pollution. Local schools, GP surgeries, and other essential
services are stretched and would face additional demand. The development would also
result in the loss of greenfield land, harm biodiversity, fragment wildlife habitats, reduce
natural drainage, increase surface water runoff and flood risk, and weaken the rural
character of the area.
Traffic based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The local road network is narrow, poorly suited to increased traffic,
and already experiences congestion at peak times. Additional vehicles would worsen
road safety concerns for residents, cyclists, and pedestrians. Footpath provision in the
area is limited and inadequate, making safe access to local services difficult and
increasing reliance on cars. The development would generate significant additional
traffic on roads that lack the capacity to accommodate further growth. It would also
increase noise and air pollution while placing further pressure on already stretched
local infrastructure and services.
Residents View focused comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purposes of the Green Belt, replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would result in the loss of the area's distinctive rural character,
transforming an open, agricultural landscape into a suburban housing estate. The visual
impact would be considerable, with new homes, roads, lighting and infrastructure
creating an intrusive urban presence. Residents would lose valued countryside views
and a sense of openness, while the development would erode the rural setting,
landscape quality and local identity that make this area unique.
Village Character and Identity comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purpose of the Green Belt by replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would erode the area's distinctive rural character and village charm,
qualities that are highly valued by residents and contribute to the village's unique
identity. The peaceful countryside setting, attractive views, and sense of separation
from larger settlements would be lost. Housing, roads and lighting would create an
intrusive urban presence, diminishing the village's character, setting, sense of place and
long-established rural appeal.
Environmental Concerns comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The scheme would result in the unnecessary loss of greenfield
land, damaging the rural character and landscape of the area. Development would
increase surface water runoff, flood risk, noise, air pollution, and carbon emissions
from additional vehicle traffic. It could lead to the loss and fragmentation of wildlife
habitats, negatively affecting birds, mammals, pollinators, and protected species.
Mature trees, hedgerows, and biodiversity corridors may also be harmed. Furthermore,
local roads, schools, healthcare services, and other infrastructure are already under
pressure and may struggle to accommodate further growth.

Basic overall comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing allocation on land between Ryecroft Lane and
Pavement Lane. This development would result in the loss of valuable open
countryside, eroding the rural character and setting of the area. The site is poorly served
by existing infrastructure, with local roads already experiencing congestion and limited
capacity to accommodate additional traffic. Increased housing would place further
pressure on GP services, schools, and other community facilities. The proposal could
also harm local biodiversity, wildlife habitats, and landscape quality. More sustainable
brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing greenfield land for residential
development in this location.
Infrastructure based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane due to its significant impact on local infrastructure and the
environment. The surrounding road network is already under pressure and lacks the
capacity to accommodate increased traffic, leading to congestion, road safety
concerns, noise, and air pollution. Local schools, GP surgeries, and other essential
services are stretched and would face additional demand. The development would also
result in the loss of greenfield land, harm biodiversity, fragment wildlife habitats, reduce
natural drainage, increase surface water runoff and flood risk, and weaken the rural
character of the area.
Traffic based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The local road network is narrow, poorly suited to increased traffic,
and already experiences congestion at peak times. Additional vehicles would worsen
road safety concerns for residents, cyclists, and pedestrians. Footpath provision in the
area is limited and inadequate, making safe access to local services difficult and
increasing reliance on cars. The development would generate significant additional
traffic on roads that lack the capacity to accommodate further growth. It would also
increase noise and air pollution while placing further pressure on already stretched
local infrastructure and services.
Residents View focused comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purposes of the Green Belt, replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would result in the loss of the area's distinctive rural character,
transforming an open, agricultural landscape into a suburban housing estate. The visual
impact would be considerable, with new homes, roads, lighting and infrastructure
creating an intrusive urban presence. Residents would lose valued countryside views
and a sense of openness, while the development would erode the rural setting,
landscape quality and local identity that make this area unique.
Village Character and Identity comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purpose of the Green Belt by replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would erode the area's distinctive rural character and village charm,
qualities that are highly valued by residents and contribute to the village's unique
identity. The peaceful countryside setting, attractive views, and sense of separation
from larger settlements would be lost. Housing, roads and lighting would create an
intrusive urban presence, diminishing the village's character, setting, sense of place and
long-established rural appeal.
Environmental Concerns comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The scheme would result in the unnecessary loss of greenfield
land, damaging the rural character and landscape of the area. Development would
increase surface water runoff, flood risk, noise, air pollution, and carbon emissions
from additional vehicle traffic. It could lead to the loss and fragmentation of wildlife
habitats, negatively affecting birds, mammals, pollinators, and protected species.
Mature trees, hedgerows, and biodiversity corridors may also be harmed. Furthermore,
local roads, schools, healthcare services, and other infrastructure are already under
pressure and may struggle to accommodate further growth.

Basic overall comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing allocation on land between Ryecroft Lane and
Pavement Lane. This development would result in the loss of valuable open
countryside, eroding the rural character and setting of the area. The site is poorly served
by existing infrastructure, with local roads already experiencing congestion and limited
capacity to accommodate additional traffic. Increased housing would place further
pressure on GP services, schools, and other community facilities. The proposal could
also harm local biodiversity, wildlife habitats, and landscape quality. More sustainable
brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing greenfield land for residential
development in this location.
Infrastructure based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane due to its significant impact on local infrastructure and the
environment. The surrounding road network is already under pressure and lacks the
capacity to accommodate increased traffic, leading to congestion, road safety
concerns, noise, and air pollution. Local schools, GP surgeries, and other essential
services are stretched and would face additional demand. The development would also
result in the loss of greenfield land, harm biodiversity, fragment wildlife habitats, reduce
natural drainage, increase surface water runoff and flood risk, and weaken the rural
character of the area.
Traffic based comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The local road network is narrow, poorly suited to increased traffic,
and already experiences congestion at peak times. Additional vehicles would worsen
road safety concerns for residents, cyclists, and pedestrians. Footpath provision in the
area is limited and inadequate, making safe access to local services difficult and
increasing reliance on cars. The development would generate significant additional
traffic on roads that lack the capacity to accommodate further growth. It would also
increase noise and air pollution while placing further pressure on already stretched
local infrastructure and services.
Residents View focused comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purposes of the Green Belt, replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would result in the loss of the area's distinctive rural character,
transforming an open, agricultural landscape into a suburban housing estate. The visual
impact would be considerable, with new homes, roads, lighting and infrastructure
creating an intrusive urban presence. Residents would lose valued countryside views
and a sense of openness, while the development would erode the rural setting,
landscape quality and local identity that make this area unique.
Village Character and Identity comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The proposal would cause significant harm to the openness and
purpose of the Green Belt by replacing undeveloped countryside with extensive built
development. It would erode the area's distinctive rural character and village charm,
qualities that are highly valued by residents and contribute to the village's unique
identity. The peaceful countryside setting, attractive views, and sense of separation
from larger settlements would be lost. Housing, roads and lighting would create an
intrusive urban presence, diminishing the village's character, setting, sense of place and
long-established rural appeal.
Environmental Concerns comment
I strongly object to the proposed housing development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane. The scheme would result in the unnecessary loss of greenfield
land, damaging the rural character and landscape of the area. Development would
increase surface water runoff, flood risk, noise, air pollution, and carbon emissions
from additional vehicle traffic. It could lead to the loss and fragmentation of wildlife
habitats, negatively affecting birds, mammals, pollinators, and protected species.
Mature trees, hedgerows, and biodiversity corridors may also be harmed. Furthermore,
local roads, schools, healthcare services, and other infrastructure are already under
pressure and may struggle to accommodate further growth.

Basic overall comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road. While
regeneration can bring benefits, this site is unsuitable due to the likely increase in traffic
congestion, pressure on local infrastructure, and loss of open space. Existing roads,
schools, healthcare services and public transport are already under strain and there is
insufficient evidence that the necessary improvements can be delivered in a timely
manner. The development would also have an adverse impact on the character of the
area, reducing the separation between built-up areas and harming local amenity.
Alternative brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing this land for
development.
Infrastructure and lack of public transport-based comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road due to
its poor accessibility and unsustainable reliance on private car travel. The site is not
adequately served by public transport, limiting realistic travel options for future
residents, employees and visitors. Train services from the local station are limited,
reducing connectivity to key employment, education and service centres. Walking and
cycling links are also insufficient to support a genuinely sustainable development. As a
result, the proposal is likely to generate significant additional car journeys, increasing
traffic congestion, carbon emissions and pressure on local roads. This conflicts with
sustainable planning principles.
Village Character and Identity comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road due to the harm it
would cause to the identity and character of the village. The village has a distinct rural
setting and strong sense of community that is closely linked to its scale, surrounding
countryside and separation from neighbouring settlements. A large mixed-use
development would fundamentally alter this character, making the village feel more
urban and reducing its unique local identity. The development risks overwhelming
existing communities, eroding the qualities that make the area attractive to residents
and visitors, and diminishing the historic and rural character that has developed over
generations.
Environmental Concerns comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road because of the
loss of Green Belt land and the harm it would cause to the openness, landscape
character and biodiversity of the area. The site provides an important undeveloped
green space that contributes to the rural setting and visual amenity of the locality.
Development would urbanise open countryside, reducing the sense of openness and
damaging important views. It would also disrupt habitats used by local wildlife,
potentially affecting birds, mammals, insects and other species that depend on these
green spaces. The proposal therefore risks causing significant and irreversible
environmental harm.

Basic overall comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road. While
regeneration can bring benefits, this site is unsuitable due to the likely increase in traffic
congestion, pressure on local infrastructure, and loss of open space. Existing roads,
schools, healthcare services and public transport are already under strain and there is
insufficient evidence that the necessary improvements can be delivered in a timely
manner. The development would also have an adverse impact on the character of the
area, reducing the separation between built-up areas and harming local amenity.
Alternative brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing this land for
development.
Infrastructure and lack of public transport-based comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road due to
its poor accessibility and unsustainable reliance on private car travel. The site is not
adequately served by public transport, limiting realistic travel options for future
residents, employees and visitors. Train services from the local station are limited,
reducing connectivity to key employment, education and service centres. Walking and
cycling links are also insufficient to support a genuinely sustainable development. As a
result, the proposal is likely to generate significant additional car journeys, increasing
traffic congestion, carbon emissions and pressure on local roads. This conflicts with
sustainable planning principles.
Village Character and Identity comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road due to the harm it
would cause to the identity and character of the village. The village has a distinct rural
setting and strong sense of community that is closely linked to its scale, surrounding
countryside and separation from neighbouring settlements. A large mixed-use
development would fundamentally alter this character, making the village feel more
urban and reducing its unique local identity. The development risks overwhelming
existing communities, eroding the qualities that make the area attractive to residents
and visitors, and diminishing the historic and rural character that has developed over
generations.
Environmental Concerns comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road because of the
loss of Green Belt land and the harm it would cause to the openness, landscape
character and biodiversity of the area. The site provides an important undeveloped
green space that contributes to the rural setting and visual amenity of the locality.
Development would urbanise open countryside, reducing the sense of openness and
damaging important views. It would also disrupt habitats used by local wildlife,
potentially affecting birds, mammals, insects and other species that depend on these
green spaces. The proposal therefore risks causing significant and irreversible
environmental harm.

Basic overall comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road. While
regeneration can bring benefits, this site is unsuitable due to the likely increase in traffic
congestion, pressure on local infrastructure, and loss of open space. Existing roads,
schools, healthcare services and public transport are already under strain and there is
insufficient evidence that the necessary improvements can be delivered in a timely
manner. The development would also have an adverse impact on the character of the
area, reducing the separation between built-up areas and harming local amenity.
Alternative brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing this land for
development.
Infrastructure and lack of public transport-based comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road due to
its poor accessibility and unsustainable reliance on private car travel. The site is not
adequately served by public transport, limiting realistic travel options for future
residents, employees and visitors. Train services from the local station are limited,
reducing connectivity to key employment, education and service centres. Walking and
cycling links are also insufficient to support a genuinely sustainable development. As a
result, the proposal is likely to generate significant additional car journeys, increasing
traffic congestion, carbon emissions and pressure on local roads. This conflicts with
sustainable planning principles.
Village Character and Identity comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road due to the harm it
would cause to the identity and character of the village. The village has a distinct rural
setting and strong sense of community that is closely linked to its scale, surrounding
countryside and separation from neighbouring settlements. A large mixed-use
development would fundamentally alter this character, making the village feel more
urban and reducing its unique local identity. The development risks overwhelming
existing communities, eroding the qualities that make the area attractive to residents
and visitors, and diminishing the historic and rural character that has developed over
generations.
Environmental Concerns comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road because of the
loss of Green Belt land and the harm it would cause to the openness, landscape
character and biodiversity of the area. The site provides an important undeveloped
green space that contributes to the rural setting and visual amenity of the locality.
Development would urbanise open countryside, reducing the sense of openness and
damaging important views. It would also disrupt habitats used by local wildlife,
potentially affecting birds, mammals, insects and other species that depend on these
green spaces. The proposal therefore risks causing significant and irreversible
environmental harm.

Basic overall comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road. While
regeneration can bring benefits, this site is unsuitable due to the likely increase in traffic
congestion, pressure on local infrastructure, and loss of open space. Existing roads,
schools, healthcare services and public transport are already under strain and there is
insufficient evidence that the necessary improvements can be delivered in a timely
manner. The development would also have an adverse impact on the character of the
area, reducing the separation between built-up areas and harming local amenity.
Alternative brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing this land for
development.
Infrastructure and lack of public transport-based comment
I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road due to
its poor accessibility and unsustainable reliance on private car travel. The site is not
adequately served by public transport, limiting realistic travel options for future
residents, employees and visitors. Train services from the local station are limited,
reducing connectivity to key employment, education and service centres. Walking and
cycling links are also insufficient to support a genuinely sustainable development. As a
result, the proposal is likely to generate significant additional car journeys, increasing
traffic congestion, carbon emissions and pressure on local roads. This conflicts with
sustainable planning principles.
Village Character and Identity comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road due to the harm it
would cause to the identity and character of the village. The village has a distinct rural
setting and strong sense of community that is closely linked to its scale, surrounding
countryside and separation from neighbouring settlements. A large mixed-use
development would fundamentally alter this character, making the village feel more
urban and reducing its unique local identity. The development risks overwhelming
existing communities, eroding the qualities that make the area attractive to residents
and visitors, and diminishing the historic and rural character that has developed over
generations.
Environmental Concerns comment
I object to the proposed development on Land North of Station Road because of the
loss of Green Belt land and the harm it would cause to the openness, landscape
character and biodiversity of the area. The site provides an important undeveloped
green space that contributes to the rural setting and visual amenity of the locality.
Development would urbanise open countryside, reducing the sense of openness and
damaging important views. It would also disrupt habitats used by local wildlife,
potentially affecting birds, mammals, insects and other species that depend on these
green spaces. The proposal therefore risks causing significant and irreversible
environmental harm.