Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Caitlin Callaghan search
New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 6331
Received: 25/08/2026
Respondent: Caitlin Callaghan
I’m objecting because this 291-hectare proposal would destroy the character of Ashley. We live in a small rural village with no facilities and a station that barely runs an hourly service, so calling it well connected feels untrue. Every road into Ashley crosses a narrow bridge, and the thought
of heavy traffic pouring through them is frightening. This is beautiful Green Belt countryside and productive farmland, surrounded by wildlife, historic buildings and peaceful landscapes. Losing all of that would change Ashley forever. Please do not take this site forward.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Green Belt
Representation ID: 6332
Received: 25/08/2026
Respondent: Caitlin Callaghan
I’m objecting because this 291-hectare proposal would destroy the character of Ashley. We live in a small rural village with no facilities and a station that barely runs an hourly service, so calling it well connected feels untrue. Every road into Ashley crosses a narrow bridge, and the thought
of heavy traffic pouring through them is frightening. This is beautiful Green Belt countryside and productive farmland, surrounded by wildlife, historic buildings and peaceful landscapes. Losing all of that would change Ashley forever. Please do not take this site forward.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Transport and infrastructure
Representation ID: 6333
Received: 25/08/2026
Respondent: Caitlin Callaghan
I’m objecting because this 291-hectare proposal would destroy the character of Ashley. We live in a small rural village with no facilities and a station that barely runs an hourly service, so calling it well connected feels untrue. Every road into Ashley crosses a narrow bridge, and the thought
of heavy traffic pouring through them is frightening. This is beautiful Green Belt countryside and productive farmland, surrounded by wildlife, historic buildings and peaceful landscapes. Losing all of that would change Ashley forever. Please do not take this site forward.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Heritage, culture and natural environment
Representation ID: 6335
Received: 25/08/2026
Respondent: Caitlin Callaghan
I’m objecting because this 291-hectare proposal would destroy the character of Ashley. We live in a small rural village with no facilities and a station that barely runs an hourly service, so calling it well connected feels untrue. Every road into Ashley crosses a narrow bridge, and the thought
of heavy traffic pouring through them is frightening. This is beautiful Green Belt countryside and productive farmland, surrounded by wildlife, historic buildings and peaceful landscapes. Losing all of that would change Ashley forever. Please do not take this site forward.
