Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for NJL Consulting search
New search New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Local plan period
Representation ID: 6476
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent supports a Local Plan period of at least 15 years but argues that Cheshire East should adopt a more ambitious 20-year plan extending to 2050. They consider this would better align with the borough’s net zero ambitions, national planning policy, and the emerging Spatial Development Strategy. A longer plan period would provide greater certainty for delivering long-term infrastructure, growth, and strategic development opportunities. The respondent highlights that national policy supports longer plan periods where significant infrastructure and phased developments are required. They therefore recommend allocating strategic sites capable of delivering substantial housing and infrastructure over an extended period to support long-term planning objectives.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting
Attachments:
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Spatial development strategy
Representation ID: 6477
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent supports aligning the Cheshire East Local Plan with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for Cheshire and Warrington, while ensuring Local Plan preparation is not delayed. They argue that the Local Plan should adopt a long-term, strategic vision that complements the SDS and supports its wider investment and growth objectives. Given that national policy requires spatial development strategies to cover at least 25 years, the respondent believes the Local Plan should identify long-term growth opportunities and infrastructure priorities. They contend that development around existing Key Service Centres will be important to delivering sustainable growth and should form a central component of the new Local Plan strategy.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting
Attachments:
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Creating a vision and objectives
Representation ID: 6478
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent supports a Local Plan vision that balances Cheshire East’s net zero ambitions with the need to deliver housing, employment, and infrastructure growth. They argue that development should be viewed as an opportunity to enhance biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport, and place quality, rather than solely as an environmental impact. The respondent contends that meeting future needs will require a mix of urban intensification, brownfield regeneration, sustainable urban extensions, strategic developments, and potentially new growth locations. They oppose restricting development solely within existing settlement boundaries and advocate a positive, long-term strategy that directs growth to sustainable locations, including opportunities around Key Service Centres such as Poynton.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting
Attachments:
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Increase in housing requirements
Representation ID: 6479
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent supports using the Standard Method housing need figure as the starting point for the Local Plan but argues that the final housing requirement should be more ambitious where justified by evidence. They believe housing provision should reflect Cheshire East’s long-term economic growth potential, opportunities arising from devolution, the Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority, and major infrastructure projects such as Northern Powerhouse Rail. The respondent also emphasises the need to address housing affordability through higher levels of delivery where appropriate. They recommend testing the housing requirement against economic growth, infrastructure, affordability, site availability, and flexibility considerations, including sustainable strategic sites such as land east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting
Attachments:
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Affordable housing
Representation ID: 6480
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent acknowledges continuing affordability challenges across Cheshire East despite recent affordable housing delivery and argues that the current approach has not fully met underlying needs. They support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment to provide robust evidence on the scale, type, size, and tenure of affordable housing required. The respondent stresses that affordable housing provision should be considered alongside overall housing requirements and the supply of viable, deliverable sites. They contend that larger housing sites can make a significant contribution to affordable housing delivery and that the Local Plan should adopt ambitious but viable policies while ensuring sufficient suitable land is allocated.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting
Attachments:
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Settlement hierarchy
Representation ID: 6481
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent supports Cheshire East’s review of the settlement hierarchy and spatial strategy, arguing that Key Service Centres should continue to play a major role in accommodating future growth. They note that such settlements have delivered a significant proportion of housing historically and possess the services, facilities, employment opportunities, and transport links needed to support sustainable development. The respondent believes the Council should assess opportunities both within and on the edges of settlements, supported by updated evidence on infrastructure, accessibility, environmental constraints, and growth capacity. They specifically consider Poynton well placed for additional sustainable growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement extensions supported by infrastructure improvements.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting
Attachments:
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Spatial distribution
Representation ID: 6482
Received: 01/09/2026
Respondent: NJL Consulting
The respondent supports Cheshire East’s review of the settlement hierarchy and spatial strategy, arguing that Key Service Centres should continue to play a major role in accommodating future growth. They note that such settlements have delivered a significant proportion of housing historically and possess the services, facilities, employment opportunities, and transport links needed to support sustainable development. The respondent believes the Council should assess opportunities both within and on the edges of settlements, supported by updated evidence on infrastructure, accessibility, environmental constraints, and growth capacity. They specifically consider Poynton well placed for additional sustainable growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement extensions supported by infrastructure improvements.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Representation on behalf of Taylor Wimpey to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping
Consultation
NJL Consulting are instructed by their client, Taylor Wimpey (TW), to make a submission in
response to the Cheshire East Council New Local Plan Scoping Consultation, in relation to their
land interest at east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.
The Site was submitted to Cheshire East Council through the March 2026 Call for Sites exercise
under ref. CFS26 502, identifying the Site as an available, suitable and achievable opportunity
for residential development with a potential capacity of approximately 150–200 dwellings.
These representations are made at an early stage of the plan-making process. They do not seek
the allocation of the Site at this stage. Rather, they seek to ensure that the emerging Local Plan's
spatial strategy, settlement hierarchy, site assessment methodology and housing delivery
strategy provide an appropriate framework through which the Site can be fully and objectively
assessed at the next stage of plan preparation.
Given the early stage of the Local Plan, and the way in which topics are presented at a high
level, the responses to the consultation have been organised by topics.
Local Plan Period
It is noted that a 15-year plan period is proposed to support longer-term planning up to March
2045, a shorter plan period than the adopted 2017 Local Plan Strategy which extends from 2010
to 2030.
While NPPF Policy PM2 now enables Local Plans to cover ‘no less’ than 10 years from the point of
adoption of the plan, we firmly believe that as a minimum the Local Plan period should run for a
minimum of 15 years. This is logical given the Borough’s target of being net zero by 2045 (ahead
of the Government’s 2050 net zero target), providing a framework to deliver on this target.
Ultimately all topics within the forthcoming Local Plan have a part to play in CEC’s net zero
aspirations and therefore alignment of the dates to this is supported.
In the case of Cheshire East taking forward its next local plan, we consider that the plan period
should be more ambitious and strategic in extending beyond this timeframe to a 20-year period
for various reasons:
• Policy PM2 (Local Plans) of the NPPF states that ‘Local Plans can cover a longer time period where this would, for example, help support the delivery of longer-term
infrastructure or strategic development’. A shorter timeframe risks the emerging Local
Plan diminishing or missing out on such opportunities for the Borough.
• The importance of the Local Plan having a strategic vision over the longer term, in our
view up to 2050, is even more important in the context of the emerging Spatial
Development Strategy where under Policy PM1 (Spatial development strategies) of the
NPPF it requires spatial strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years. The current
approach would risk being out of step and alignment.
Following the above, it is incumbent upon the Council under NPPF PM1 to include strategic sites
within the emerging Local Plan to create greater confidence and long-term certainty over the
Plan period to achieve longer term policy ambitions relating to growth and infrastructure. Such
sites are defined in the NPPF as sites which would be implemented in multiple phases, have
significant infrastructure requirements and require a masterplan. For residential led development,
the NPPF definition notes strategic sites should ‘typically’ have capacity for at least 1,500
dwellings.
Given the above, we would strongly recommend that Cheshire East should be targeting a longer
Plan period of 20 years.
Spatial Development Strategy
The Scoping Consultation confirms that the Cheshire East Local Plan will need to be in general
conformity with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for the Cheshire and
Warrington Combined Authority area, whilst also recognising that the emerging SDS should not
delay preparation of the Local Plan. This approach is supported.
However, given the emerging sub-regional context, it will be important that the new Local Plan
is sufficiently strategic and forward-looking to align effectively with the longer-term ambitions of
the emerging SDS.
NPPF Policy PM1 requires spatial development strategies to cover a period of at least 25 years.
Whilst the Local Plan will need to operate within its own plan period, it should nevertheless adopt
a sufficiently long-term vision to ensure that its policies, allocations and infrastructure strategy
can support the direction of travel established through the SDS
Given the emerging SDS will act as the spatial framework for investment across the sub region, it
is imperative that the emerging Local Plan also considers and identifies long-term growth
opportunities and strategic infrastructure priorities such that there is clear alignment between the
Local Plan and the emerging SDS. The growth and development around the current Key Service
Centres will inevitably form a core component to the strategic ambitions for the emerging
Combined Authority (as a whole) and should therefore form a key part of the new Local Plan.
Vision & Objectives
The proposed vision and objectives should provide a clear and deliverable framework for
achieving the Council's ambition for Cheshire East to become net zero by 2045. It is important,
however, that this ambition is considered alongside the Council's other statutory and strategic
responsibilities, including meeting housing and employment requirements and ensuring that
development is supported by appropriate infrastructure. The new Local Plan should therefore establish a vision which identifies how the Borough can
accommodate necessary growth whilst simultaneously delivering improvements to the
environment, biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport and the quality of existing
and new places.
This will require the Council to identify locations where development can make a positive
contribution to the delivery of these objectives, rather than viewing development solely through
the lens of its potential environmental impacts. The scale of development required over the
longer term means that there is likely to be a need for a combination of:
• Development and intensification within existing urban areas;
• Regeneration and redevelopment of previously developed land;
• Sustainable edge-of-settlement extensions;
• Larger strategic development opportunities; and
• Potentially new locations for growth if justified by the evidence.
The Council should therefore avoid an approach which assumes that all future housing growth
can or should be accommodated within existing settlement boundaries. The emerging vision
should recognise that well-planned growth can be a mechanism for delivering environmental
and infrastructure improvements, provided that development is directed towards appropriate
locations and supported by robust master planning.
Accordingly, the new Local Plan should adopt a positive and long-term vision which seeks to
accommodate necessary growth in locations where it can be integrated with existing
settlements and where development can contribute towards the Council's wider environmental,
social and economic objectives. In this context, the future growth of Key Service Centres such
as Poynton, including the assessment of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities such as
Waterloo Road, should form an important component of the emerging strategy.
Increase in Housing Requirements
The Scoping Consultation confirms that, in accordance with national planning policy, the Local
Housing Need (LHN) figure derived from the Standard Method should be used as the starting
point when determining the housing requirement for the new Local Plan. The Consultation also
appropriately recognises that the housing requirement may need to be higher than the Standard
Method figure where, for example, there is a need to meet the requirements of neighbouring
areas, support economic growth ambitions or facilitate infrastructure investment. This approach
is fully supported.
Whilst the Standard Method provides an appropriate starting point, the Council should ensure
that the housing requirement ultimately adopted through the new Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious to respond to the wider needs and opportunities of Cheshire East. The housing
requirement should not be treated as a ceiling where there is clear evidence that a higher level
of provision would support the Council's economic, social and infrastructure objectives.
In particular, the Council should ensure that the emerging housing requirement properly reflects
the long-term economic growth potential of Cheshire East. The Borough is strategically well
placed to benefit from wider investment and structural changes arising from the Government's
devolution agenda, the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority arrangements and the potential future delivery of major strategic transport infrastructure, including Northern
Powerhouse Rail.
These wider opportunities have the potential to increase employment, investment and demand
for housing over the plan period. The new Local Plan should therefore take a suitably long-term
and proactive approach to the relationship between housing delivery, economic growth and
infrastructure investment, rather than simply planning for the minimum level of housing
generated by the Standard Method.
The Council should also have regard to the relationship between the overall housing requirement
and its ability to address affordable housing need. As set out in our representations in response
to paragraphs 5.33–5.35, the Scoping Consultation acknowledges that housing affordability
remains a significant challenge across Cheshire East. The strategic housing requirement should
therefore be sufficiently ambitious to support the delivery of the affordable housing needed
across the Borough over the plan period.
A higher overall level of housing delivery, where justified by the evidence, would provide greater
opportunities to secure affordable housing through new development and would help to ensure
that the Local Plan responds positively to the identified affordability pressures.
At this stage, no specific housing requirement has been identified through the Scoping
Consultation. It is appropriate, therefore, for the Council to use the Standard Method LHN figure
as the starting point for determining the housing requirement. However, the subsequent
evidence base should robustly test whether a higher requirement is justified, having regard to:
• The scale of economic growth and employment opportunities anticipated over the plan
period;
• The strategic ambitions of cheshire east and the wider Cheshire and Warrington area;
• The potential benefits arising from strategic transport investment;
• Housing affordability and affordable housing need;
• Infrastructure investment and delivery;
• The availability and deliverability of suitable housing sites; and
• The need to provide sufficient flexibility and resilience within the housing supply.
The Council should accordingly adopt a positively prepared and sufficiently ambitious housing
requirement which responds to the full range of identified needs and opportunities rather than
simply replicating the minimum Standard Method figure.
This will also be important in determining the spatial strategy and the scale of development that
needs to be accommodated at sustainable settlements across the Borough. The identification
of a sufficiently ambitious housing requirement should be followed by a robust assessment of the
range of sites capable of delivering that growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement and
strategic extension opportunities at Key Service Centres.
In this regard, the emerging Local Plan should ensure that sustainable and deliverable sites such
as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton are properly considered as part of the solution to
meeting the Borough's future housing requirements.
Affordable Housing The Scoping Consultation acknowledges that, notwithstanding the relatively strong delivery of
affordable housing in recent years, housing affordability remains a significant challenge across
Cheshire East.
Whilst the Council has been able to demonstrate affordable housing delivery against the
requirements of the adopted Local Plan Strategy, the continued and significant affordability
pressures across the Borough indicate that the level of provision secured through the existing
planning framework has not been sufficient to address the underlying need. The new Local Plan
therefore provides an important opportunity to consider whether the current approach is
sufficiently ambitious to respond to the scale and nature of affordable housing need over the
new plan period.
We strongly support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) as part of
the evidence base. It will be important that this work provides a robust and up-to-date
assessment of affordable housing need, including the scale, tenure, type and size of affordable
homes required, and that the findings are appropriately reflected in the emerging spatial
strategy and policy requirements.
The Council should also ensure that the assessment of affordable housing need is considered
alongside the overall housing requirement and the availability of deliverable housing sites.
Maximising affordable housing delivery will depend not only on the percentage requirement
applied to individual developments, but also on ensuring that sufficient viable and deliverable
sites are identified through the Local Plan to support sustained housing delivery.
In this context, larger sites capable of delivering a meaningful quantum of housing should play
an important role in the emerging strategy. Sites such as Land East of Waterloo Road, Poynton,
have the potential to make a significant contribution towards both overall housing delivery and
the provision of affordable housing.
The emerging Local Plan should therefore adopt an appropriately ambitious approach to
affordable housing, whilst ensuring that policy requirements remain informed by robust evidence
and viability considerations. This should include ensuring that sufficient suitable and deliverable
sites are identified to provide the scale of housing necessary to maximise opportunities for
affordable housing delivery across the Borough.
Settlement Hierarchy and Spatial Distribution
The Scoping Consultation notes that, whilst there is no specific requirement in national policy to
establish a settlement hierarchy, it is a commonly used approach to inform the spatial distribution
of development and the approach to site allocations.
For Cheshire East, the Scoping Consultation confirms that establishing a settlement hierarchy will
form an integral part of the future planning strategy, informing the spatial distribution of
development and the approach to site allocations. It is also noted that the evidence base is
being updated to inform a review of the settlement hierarchy. This approach is fully supported.
The Scoping Consultation also appropriately recognises that the spatial distribution of
development will need to consider a range of options, including opportunities for edge-of settlement growth and large-scale urban extensions. This is consistent with the approach to
strategic site development set out in national policy, which requires development plans to
identify suitable locations for strategic sites for housing-led development, including significant extensions to existing settlements.
Whilst the emerging evidence base is still being prepared and it would be premature to seek to
predetermine the outcome of the spatial strategy, it is considered that Key Service Centres
should continue to play an important role in accommodating the Borough's future housing
requirements.
Key Service Centres have been integral to the delivery of Cheshire East's growth over the
adopted Local Plan period and, more particularly, since 2017. The level of growth directed
towards these settlements reflects their established role within the settlement hierarchy and their
ability to accommodate development whilst supporting the vitality and viability of existing
services and facilities. The Council's latest Annual Monitoring Report demonstrates the
importance of Key Service Centres to the delivery of the adopted spatial strategy. Key Service
Centres have accounted for 48% of housing completions over the Plan period, representing a
greater proportion than any other settlement category, compared with 30% in Principal Towns,
11% in Local Service Centres and 11% in Other Villages and Rural Areas.
This delivery record provides important evidence that Key Service Centres have both the
capacity and market attractiveness to accommodate significant levels of housing growth. It also
demonstrates the importance of continuing to consider these settlements as part of the strategy
for meeting the increased housing requirement over the new Local Plan period.
As part of the Local Plan process, the Council should therefore identify opportunities within and
around Key Service Centres which can respond positively to national and local planning policy
and the Council's strategic objectives, particularly where development can deliver sustainable,
integrated and well-planned growth around the existing urban area.
In this regard, the Council should ensure that the assessment of potential growth locations does
not focus solely on opportunities within existing settlement boundaries. The scale of growth
required means that consideration will also need to be given to appropriate edge-of-settlement
locations and strategic extensions where these can be satisfactorily integrated with existing
settlements and supported by appropriate infrastructure.
As part of the evidence base supporting the new Local Plan, the Council should undertake an
update of the settlement studies which underpin the existing settlement hierarchy. The existing
settlement reports were prepared in 2020 and should now be updated to reflect the significant
changes which have taken place since their preparation, including the development and
delivery of existing allocations and the infrastructure and service implications arising from that
growth.
An updated assessment should consider, for each settlement:
• The capacity for further development within the existing settlement boundary;
• The extent and nature of development already delivered since the previous assessment;
• The availability and capacity of existing services and facilities;
• Transport and accessibility characteristics;
• Infrastructure requirements and constraints;
• Landscape, environmental and green belt considerations;
• The potential for further sustainable growth; and
• The opportunities and constraints associated with potential edge-of-settlement extensions.
Such an assessment would provide an up-to-date and consistent evidence base for determining
the appropriate level and distribution of growth across the settlement hierarchy. Importantly, the
assessment should also consider whether the infrastructure and community facilities within
individual settlements have kept pace with the level of growth already accommodated. Where
deficiencies have emerged, these should be identified alongside opportunities for future
development to contribute towards addressing those deficiencies.
Poynton is identified within the Scoping Consultation as a Key Service Centre and is strategically
well positioned to contribute towards the Council's future growth requirements. The settlement
benefits from a strong range of services and facilities, established employment opportunities and
good connectivity to surrounding settlements and employment areas. It also has access to the
wider strategic road and rail network, including links towards Manchester and the surrounding
sub-regional employment areas.
Poynton's role as a Key Service Centre, together with its established infrastructure and services,
means that it should be tested as a location capable of accommodating further sustainable
growth. This should include consideration of appropriate edge-of-settlement opportunities which
can be integrated with the existing urban area and which have the potential to provide
additional infrastructure and environmental benefits as part of their development.
In this context, the Council should assess the potential for further growth at Poynton based on
the settlement's overall capacity and its relationship with individual sites promoted through the
Call for Sites process, rather than applying an assumption that the existing settlement boundary
represents the appropriate long-term extent of the settlement.
Conclusion
These representations have been prepared on behalf of Taylor Wimpey in response to Cheshire
East Council’s New Local Plan Scoping Consultation. The representations are structured around
the topics and questions identified within the Scoping Consultation document.
Overall, Taylor Wimpey is broadly supportive of the proposed scope of the emerging Local Plan
and the approach to engagement at this initial stage. However, there are a number of matters
which we consider particularly important to the successful preparation of the Plan and which
should be given appropriate consideration as the evidence base and policy framework
develop. In particular, we would wish to highlight the following key points:
• Strategic vision and plan period: The new Local Plan should establish a genuinely
strategic vision and policy framework for Cheshire East. In this regard, we consider that a
20-year plan period, extending to 2050, would provide a more appropriate strategic
horizon. This would better align with the Council’s longer-term objectives, including its
ambitions around net zero, whilst also providing greater alignment with the emerging
Spatial Development Strategy for the Combined Authority area, which is anticipated to
consider growth over a 25-year period.
• Housing requirement and the Standard Method: The Standard Method should be used
as the starting point for establishing the Local Housing Need and determining the housing
requirement for the Plan. We welcome the Council’s recognition that its wider growth, economic and infrastructure ambitions may justify a housing requirement above the
minimum identified through the Standard Method. The Plan should ensure that these
wider opportunities are properly considered in establishing an appropriate and
deliverable housing requirement.
• Growth, devolution and infrastructure: In determining the overall housing requirement,
the Council should fully consider the opportunities arising from devolution, the formation
of the Combined Authority and planned strategic infrastructure investment. The Local
Plan provides an important opportunity to support and capitalise on these wider
economic and infrastructure ambitions, rather than simply responding to demographic
projections. The housing requirement should therefore reflect the role Cheshire East can
play in supporting wider sub-regional growth and investment.
• Affordable housing delivery: Given the acknowledged affordability challenges across
Cheshire East, the new Local Plan should consider how the overall housing requirement
can support a significant increase in affordable housing delivery. This should be informed
by the Council’s evidence of affordable housing need, whilst also having appropriate
regard to viability and the need to ensure that the overall housing strategy remains
realistic and deliverable. Increasing the overall supply of housing will be an important
component of addressing affordability alongside appropriate affordable housing
policies.
• Spatial distribution of growth: The evidence base should appropriately address crossboundary housing, employment and infrastructure matters, particularly in light of the
emerging Combined Authority and Spatial Development Strategy. Updated settlement
studies should be prepared to identify the most appropriate locations for
accommodating future growth, having regard to the relative sustainability and
constraints of individual settlements. This assessment should not be undertaken in isolation
from the wider strategic planning context and should ensure that growth is directed
towards locations where it can be sustainably accommodated.
• Role and capacity of existing settlements: In considering the spatial distribution of
development, the Council should assess the potential of each existing settlement to
accommodate and support further growth, including the opportunities presented by sites
submitted through the Local Plan process. This should include consideration of what
individual sites could deliver in terms of new or enhanced services, infrastructure and
connectivity, and how this could support increased levels of sustainable travel and
improve the overall sustainability and resilience of the settlement. Sites should therefore
be considered not only in terms of their existing constraints, but also in terms of the wider
opportunities they may provide to support sustainable growth.
These matters will be particularly important in ensuring that the emerging Local Plan is sufficiently
ambitious, strategic and responsive to the changing planning context, including the emerging
Combined Authority, Spatial Development Strategy, infrastructure investment and the need to
address housing affordability.
We trust that these representations will be taken into account as part of the preparation of the
New Local Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss any of the matters raised, including
those relating to the suggested allocation and the wider points raised in response to the Scoping
Consultation, and to assist the Council in progressing a robust, effective and sound Local Plan.
Yours sincerely,
On behalf of NJL Consulting