Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for NJL Consulting search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Local plan period

Representation ID: 6476

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports a Local Plan period of at least 15 years but argues that Cheshire East should adopt a more ambitious 20-year plan extending to 2050. They consider this would better align with the borough’s net zero ambitions, national planning policy, and the emerging Spatial Development Strategy. A longer plan period would provide greater certainty for delivering long-term infrastructure, growth, and strategic development opportunities. The respondent highlights that national policy supports longer plan periods where significant infrastructure and phased developments are required. They therefore recommend allocating strategic sites capable of delivering substantial housing and infrastructure over an extended period to support long-term planning objectives.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial development strategy

Representation ID: 6477

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports aligning the Cheshire East Local Plan with the emerging Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for Cheshire and Warrington, while ensuring Local Plan preparation is not delayed. They argue that the Local Plan should adopt a long-term, strategic vision that complements the SDS and supports its wider investment and growth objectives. Given that national policy requires spatial development strategies to cover at least 25 years, the respondent believes the Local Plan should identify long-term growth opportunities and infrastructure priorities. They contend that development around existing Key Service Centres will be important to delivering sustainable growth and should form a central component of the new Local Plan strategy.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Creating a vision and objectives

Representation ID: 6478

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports a Local Plan vision that balances Cheshire East’s net zero ambitions with the need to deliver housing, employment, and infrastructure growth. They argue that development should be viewed as an opportunity to enhance biodiversity, green infrastructure, sustainable transport, and place quality, rather than solely as an environmental impact. The respondent contends that meeting future needs will require a mix of urban intensification, brownfield regeneration, sustainable urban extensions, strategic developments, and potentially new growth locations. They oppose restricting development solely within existing settlement boundaries and advocate a positive, long-term strategy that directs growth to sustainable locations, including opportunities around Key Service Centres such as Poynton.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Increase in housing requirements

Representation ID: 6479

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports using the Standard Method housing need figure as the starting point for the Local Plan but argues that the final housing requirement should be more ambitious where justified by evidence. They believe housing provision should reflect Cheshire East’s long-term economic growth potential, opportunities arising from devolution, the Cheshire and Warrington Combined Authority, and major infrastructure projects such as Northern Powerhouse Rail. The respondent also emphasises the need to address housing affordability through higher levels of delivery where appropriate. They recommend testing the housing requirement against economic growth, infrastructure, affordability, site availability, and flexibility considerations, including sustainable strategic sites such as land east of Waterloo Road, Poynton.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Affordable housing

Representation ID: 6480

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent acknowledges continuing affordability challenges across Cheshire East despite recent affordable housing delivery and argues that the current approach has not fully met underlying needs. They support the preparation of an updated Housing Needs Assessment to provide robust evidence on the scale, type, size, and tenure of affordable housing required. The respondent stresses that affordable housing provision should be considered alongside overall housing requirements and the supply of viable, deliverable sites. They contend that larger housing sites can make a significant contribution to affordable housing delivery and that the Local Plan should adopt ambitious but viable policies while ensuring sufficient suitable land is allocated.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Settlement hierarchy

Representation ID: 6481

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports Cheshire East’s review of the settlement hierarchy and spatial strategy, arguing that Key Service Centres should continue to play a major role in accommodating future growth. They note that such settlements have delivered a significant proportion of housing historically and possess the services, facilities, employment opportunities, and transport links needed to support sustainable development. The respondent believes the Council should assess opportunities both within and on the edges of settlements, supported by updated evidence on infrastructure, accessibility, environmental constraints, and growth capacity. They specifically consider Poynton well placed for additional sustainable growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement extensions supported by infrastructure improvements.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial distribution

Representation ID: 6482

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: NJL Consulting

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports Cheshire East’s review of the settlement hierarchy and spatial strategy, arguing that Key Service Centres should continue to play a major role in accommodating future growth. They note that such settlements have delivered a significant proportion of housing historically and possess the services, facilities, employment opportunities, and transport links needed to support sustainable development. The respondent believes the Council should assess opportunities both within and on the edges of settlements, supported by updated evidence on infrastructure, accessibility, environmental constraints, and growth capacity. They specifically consider Poynton well placed for additional sustainable growth, including appropriate edge-of-settlement extensions supported by infrastructure improvements.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.