Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Chris Gibson86 search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Respondent: Chris Gibson86
Representation Summary:
The respondent objects to any proposal that would release Green Belt land around Macclesfield for development and urges the Council to retain existing Green Belt boundaries. The submission advocates a brownfield-first approach, arguing that previously developed land should be prioritised before Green Belt sites are considered. Concerns are raised regarding the visual and landscape impact of development, loss of countryside character, and the role of the Green Belt in maintaining a clear transition between Macclesfield and the surrounding countryside. The respondent also highlights the site's biodiversity value, wildlife habitat function and recreational importance, arguing that development would harm environmental quality, local character and public enjoyment of the area.
Full text:
I am writing to formally submit my comments regarding the scope of the new Cheshire East Local Plan. [personal information redacted], I am deeply concerned by proposals from property developers to include local Green Belt land adjacent to our homes within the ‘call for sites’ process for potential housing development.
I strongly object to any strategic inclusion, boundary review, or policy shift that would enable the erosion or loss of this Green Belt.
I request that Cheshire East Council protects and retains the existing Green Belt boundaries around Macclesfield based on the following valid planning criteria:
• Brownfield-first approach
The council must adhere to a strict “brownfield first” strategy. The new Local Plan should fully identify, prioritise, and utilise previously developed land (brownfield) and non Green Belt greenfield sites across the borough before any consideration is given to altering protected Green Belt boundaries.
• Severe Visual and Landscape Impact Removing Green Belt status from this land would cause a significant and irreversible negative impact on Macclesfield’s landscape. Development here would destroy the semi rural character of the area, replacing open countryside vistas with suburban expansion.
• Protection of the Countryside Buffer
This specific Green Belt parcel provides a crucial physical and visual transition between Macclesfield’s built environment and the open countryside. It prevents urban encroachment, maintains settlement boundaries, and safeguards the rural setting that defines our community.
• Environmental and Ecosystem Value
This site is an active wildlife corridor and a functioning ecosystem. It is a known crossing point for toads and supports buzzards, owls, bats, rodents, deer, and other species that rely on its hedgerows, grassland, and tree cover. Development would fragment habitats, reduce biodiversity, and undermine natural processes such as carbon sequestration, soil health, and ecological resilience.
• Community Landscape and Recreation Value
The viewpoint on this land is enjoyed by residents across the town and is a recognised stopping point for walkers and hikers. It contributes to Macclesfield’s cultural landscape, offering panoramic views that attract visitors and form part of established recreational routes. Development would permanently remove this valued public amenity.
While I understand that ‘call for sites’ submissions do not currently hold planning or allocation status, the foundational scope of the new Local Plan must reinforce Green Belt protections rather than signal openness to their removal.I urge the council to listen to the community, uphold the core purposes of the Green Belt as set out in national policy, and ensure this land remains fully protected within the new Local Plan framework. Please keep me informed of the progress of this consultation and the upcoming ‘Plan, Content & Evidence’ stages.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.