Local plan scoping consultation

I am writing to formally object to the inclusion of the 291.03-hectare land submission around
Ashley (12 adjoining sites totalling 291.03 hectares) in the Cheshire East Incal Plan / SHELAA.
1. Conflict with Green Belt policy (North Cheshire Green Belt & 'Wash-Over' Status):
Wash-Over Green Bele The parish of Ashley is designated as "wash—over" Green Belt—
the most protective form of rural Green Belt classification.
Regional Strategic Buffer: Established in the 1950s specifically to prevent urban sprawl,
Ashley forms the crucial narrow green buffer separating South Manchester and Trafford
(Hale, Hale Barns, Altrincham) from villages and towns in Cheshire East (Mobberley,
Knutsford).
Failure of the National "Grey Beltn Test: Under national policy, Green Belt land can only
be considered for release if it meets thc definition of "Grey Belt" (previously developed
brownfield land or land that makes a negligible contribution to Green Belt purposes).
Open, working farmland across Ashley fails this test.
Direct Conflict with Core Green Belt Purposes
o pmpose.-4 (Cieck Unnstricted Sprawl): Serves as the primary barrier preventing the
Manchester conurbation from expanding southwards.
pmpore B (Pmve,'.'t Tonus Mewing): Building across these 291.03 hectares would
physically merge Greater Manchester settlements With Cheshire villages and
o Purpose C (Safeguard the Countyside): Protects active, open agricultural I 'and from
suburban encroachment. Protecting this land aligns with national policy to
preserve prime agricultural resources.
2. Sustainable Settlement Hierarchy: Ashley is a small, rural parish with very little public
transport, primary infrastructure, medical facilities, or local employment. Allocating large-scale
development here violates sustainable development principles, which require growth to be
focused on Tier 1 and Tier 2 urban centres.
3. Highways & Safety: The surrounding rural road network, constrained by narrow railway
bridges and single-lane pinch points, cannot safely accommodate thousands of additional vehicle
movements tounard the A538 and M56.
4. Inadequate Rail Connections: Ashley train station lacks the service capacity needed for
sustainable transit. It operates on a maximum frequency of just one train per hour in each
direction. Furthermore, with the planned new station at Cheadle progressing (it has planning
permission and is fully funded), prospective service reallocations would reduce Ashley's service
frequency to a single train CVCry t'.VO hours, rendering rail commuting unfeasible for new
residents. In March 2026 Keir Mather MP, parliamentary under-sccrcrary of stare in the
Department for Transport, stated, in Parliament, "The Rail North partnership board is the
decision-making board for service considerations for Northern Trains J and TransPcnnine
trains, and is one part of the process that needs to take place to enable the service change. It is
now evident that service change, including reducing the frequency Of services that Stop at Ashley
and Plumley, is the only way that an hourly stop at a new station ar Cheadle could be
accommodated."
5. Thc land falls directly within Hight path operational noise contours and bird-strike hazard
safety zones, making high-density housing unsuitable.
6. Drainage & Utilities: The area lacks deep sewer, grid, and surface water drainage Capacity,
presenting h_igh surface-water flood risks to the River Bollin catchment.
7. Loss of High-Grade Agricultural Land (BMV): Independent soil surveys (including HS2 Phase
2b data) confirm the land contains Grade 2 and Subgrade 3a Best and Most Versatile (BMX')
agricultural land, which national policy protects for food security.
8. Environmental Heritage Harm: Development would cause irreparable harm to the Bollin
Valley and Parklands LI-I), Rostherne/TattOn Park LID, Cotterill Clough Nature Reserve,
ancient woodlands, protected species corridors, and the setting of 19 Grade 11 listed buildings
(including Ashley Hall).
I request that Cheshire East Council formally classify this 291.03-hectare area (12 adjoining sites
totalling 291.03 hectares) as Unsuitable and Undeliverable in the assessment.