Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Thomas Jones search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation Summary:
I object to the inclusion of the 291.03-hectare Ashley site within the SHELAA and Local Plan process. I consider Ashley an unsuitable location for strategic-scale development due to its position within the settlement hierarchy, limited services, poor public transport connectivity and infrastructure constraints. I believe the proposal would conflict with Green Belt objectives, result in the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, and cause significant impacts on landscape character, biodiversity, heritage assets and the rural setting of Ashley. I also raise concerns regarding highway capacity, airport safeguarding, flood risk, drainage and utility infrastructure. I therefore request that the site be assessed as unsuitable, unavailable and undeliverable.
Full text:
I am writing to register an explicit formal objection to allocating or considering the 291.03-
hectare tract Of land surrounding Ashley across all 12 interconnected parcels within the
SHELÆA and broader Local Plan review. Promoting strategic development on this scale in
an unsustainable rural location is entirely unfeasible and violates statutory planning
frameworks.
1. Invalidation under Spatial Strategy and Settlement Hierarchy
• Lowest Settlement Tier: Under CELPS Policy PG 2, Ashley occupies the lowest tier
of the local settlement structure, completely lacking the primary education, healthcare
services, and employment opportunities required to support population growth.
Violation of Sustainable Location Frameworks: Directing massive housing to an
isolated rural settlement conflicts directly with CELPS Policy SD 1, Policy SD 2, and
national plan-making guidelines requiring strategic development to be focused within
Tier I Principal Towns and Tier 2 Key Service Centres.
2. Transport Infrastructure Deficits, Highway Hazards, and Aviation Restrictions
Inadequate Rail Connectivity: Ashley station operates at a low frequency of just I
train per hour in each direction and has no commuter parking. Service frequency will
Worsen following the opening Of the funded station at Cheadle. In March 2026,
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport Keir Mather MP confirmed that
reducing Ashley and Plumley service calls to one train every two hours is required by
the Rail North Partnership Board to enable Cheadle's hourly Stops. This reduction
renders public transit unviable for prospective residents and fails national "well-
connected station" criteria for higher-density rural growth.
Network Pinch Points and Narrow Bridges: Local narrow lanes Cannot absorb
major vehicular volumes. Critical bottlenecks created by single-lane bridges over the
railway line, River Bollin, and Birkin Brook would trigger severe cumulative
congestion and road safety hazards, breaching CELPS Policy CO 1 , Policy CO 4, and
national transport policies.
Aerodrome Safeguarding Hazards: Positioned directly beneath Manchester Airpon
operational flight paths, the land falls within noise restriction and bird-strike
management zones, violating CELPS policy SE 12 and mandatory aerodrome safety
rules.
3. Severe Impacts on Landscape, Biodiversity, and Heritage Assets
• Landscape Degradation: Allocating these sites would irreparably harm the settings
of both the Bollin Valley and Parklands Local Landscape Designation (LLD) and the
Rosthernerratton Park LLD, breaching CELPS policy SE 4.
Ecological Severance: paving over this open expanse would fragment established
habitat corridors and imperil protected ecological sites, including the adjacent
Cotterill Clough SSSI / Nature Reserve, violating CELPS Policy SE 3 and national
nature recovery policies.
Heritage Assets Compromised: The Open fields frame the settings of 19 Grade 11
listed buildings, including Ashley Hall. Development breaches CELPS policy SE 7
and national heritage protections requiring great weight to be given to preserving
designated historic assets and their rural settings.
4. Non-Compliance with Green Belt Protections and "Grey Belt" Criteria
Wash-Over Green Belt Status: The entire parish of Ashley carries "wash-over"
Green Belt protection under CELPS Policy PG 3 to preserve its sensitive rural
character.
Encroachment & Settlement Coalescence: Ashley represents the narrowest
remaining countryside gap separating Greater Manchester (Trafford, Hale,
Altrincham) from Cheshire East (Knutsford, Mobberley). Developing the site drives
urban sprawl and causes settlement merging, violating core national Green Belt
objectives.
Disqualification from "Grey Belt": Under Policy GB7 ofthe current NPPF
framework, "Grey Belt" exceptions require land to make a negligible contribution to
Green Belt purposes. This active farmland performs essential Green Belt functions,
while its acute heritage, ecological, and flood constraints present severe barriers under
national policy.
5. Destruction of Best and Most Versatile (BMV) Agricultural Farmland
• High-Grade Soil Quality: Land assessments (including HS2 Phase 2b survey data)
confirm that the 291.03 -hectare site consists predominantly of Grade 2 and Subgrade
3aBMV soil.
Undermining Food Security: Converting this contiguous, highly productive
agricultural area to housing threatens regional food production, violating CELPS
Policy SE 2 and national mandates to safeguard top-tier agricultural land and
prioritize lower-grade or brownfield options.
6. Drainage, Hydrological Risks, and Utility Infrastructure Inadequacies
• Surface Water & Flood Risks: Converting open farmland into hardstanding would
dramatically increase runoff into the River Bollin catchment, compounding
downstream flood risks in violation of CELPS Policy SE 13 and national flood
resilience policies.
• Infrastructure Constraints: The site lacks the sewer network, power grid capacity,
and utility infrastructure necessary for bulk residential development, failing the
deliverability criteria of CELPS Policy [N I.
Conclusion and Action Requested The submission across all 12 contiguous parcels
(totalling 291.03 hectares) fails every applicable local and national planning policy. I
formally request that Cheshire East Council record all 12 site parcels as Unsuitable,
Unavailable, and Undeliverable in the SHELAA assessment and omit them completely
from future Local Plan allocations.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.